ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2025
The prevalence of moral distress and moral injury among U.S. veterans.
Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deconstructing Trauma: How Military Experiences Affect Veteran Prison Misconduct.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- Moral injury in animal care workers: prevalence, pathways, and phenomenology in a cross-sector sample.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The role of measurement in moral injury care: latent profiles on the moral injury and distress scale.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Moral injury is a syndrome that involves adverse outcomes stemming from experiences violating deeply held moral beliefs. Moral injury has emerged as a distinct mental health concern, yet its prevalence among U.S. veterans remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs), moral distress, and moral injury among U.S. veterans. This cross-sectional study surveyed a nationally representative sample of 3002 U.S. veterans using KnowledgePanel. The Moral Injury Outcome Scale assessed PMIE exposure, moral distress (subclinical), moral injury (clinical syndrome), and their functional impact. Among respondents, 44.7 % (95 % CI, 42.1-47.2) endorsed PMIEs; 45.2 % reported witnessing inhumanity, 40.2 % were directly affected by others' transgressions, and 14.0 % reported perpetrating transgressive acts. The weighted prevalence of moral distress and moral injury among PMIE endorsers was 9.1 % (95 % CI, 7.1-11.2) and 13.1 % (95 % CI, 9.9-16.3), respectively. In the full sample, prevalence was 4.1 % (95 % CI, 3.1-5.0) for moral distress and 5.9 % (95 % CI, 4.4-7.4) for moral injury. Moral injury was associated with significant functional impairment, with most cases characterized by shame-related (47.8 %) or blended subvariant symptoms (33.3 %). Approximately 664,000 and 955,000 U.S. veterans report functionally impairing moral distress and moral injury, respectively. These findings highlight the need for surveillance, mitigation, and treatment for these unique mental health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.