Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601925›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

eHealth Literacy and Its Outcomes Among Postsecondary Students: Systematic Review.

Qin Li, Fang Fang, Yan Zhang, Jiayuan Tu, Pingting Zhu, Lijuan Xi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qin Li *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5842-4578
Fang Fang *Department of Nursing, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-9108
Yan Zhang *Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University (Taizhou People's Hospital), Taizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-5642
Jiayuan Tu *School of Nursing (School of Public Health), Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-2562
Pingting ZhuSchool of Nursing (School of Public Health), Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-2725
Lijuan XiSchool of Nursing (School of Public Health), Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-7043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth literacy is essential for postsecondary students; however, few studies have systematically reviewed its levels and related outcomes in this population.

objectiveThis study aims to systematically review the existing literature on eHealth literacy levels and the associated outcomes among postsecondary students.

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Base, and OpenGrey databases for studies published from 2006 to July 01, 2024, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were eligible if they were quantitative research papers, assessed eHealth literacy, described the relationship between eHealth literacy and other outcomes, and included postsecondary students. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies.

resultsA total of 89 cross-sectional studies were included from among 45,168 eHealth literacy-related publications, with 68 rated as high quality and 21 as moderate quality. Various assessment tools were used across studies, with the eHealth Literacy Scale being the most commonly used (56/89, 63%). Reported eHealth literacy total scores ranged from 23.6 (SD 6.8) to 31.4 (SD 4.4), and mean item scores ranged from 3.42 (SD 0.61) to 4.10 (SD 0.56). Associated outcomes were grouped into cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. eHealth literacy was positively associated with cognitive outcomes, including health knowledge, self-efficacy, disease prevention behaviors, and health attitudes. Regarding emotional outcomes, eHealth literacy was linked to higher psychosocial well-being, more positive emotions, and lower negative emotions; however, its associations with overall well-being, depression, and COVID-19 fear were inconclusive. Regarding behavioral outcomes, eHealth literacy was associated with greater use of electronic information, disease prevention practices, volunteerism, and clinical decision-making. Its relationships with health care use, social media engagement, and healthy living were more complex and context-dependent.

conclusionseHealth literacy among postsecondary students ranges from moderate-low to moderate-high, with variations due to inconsistent assessment tools. It shows positive associations with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes, though links to healthy living, digital and health service engagement, and certain psychosocial aspects remain complex. Future research should standardize measurements and explore the mechanisms across disciplines and cultures to guide effective health promotion.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024559587; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024559587.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyStudentsTelemedicineCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansbehaviorcognitioneHealth literacyemotionsstudents

Identifiers

PMID40601925
PMCPMC12278882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.