ArticleJCO precision oncology2025
Feasibility of Personalized and Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Early Recurrence Detection in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A streamlined hybrid-capture and genome-wide multi-omic platform for highly sensitive ctDNA minimal residual disease monitoring.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Review
- Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant cholangiocarcinoma for biomarker-guided therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- AFP Model Predicts Outcomes After Liver Resection: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy-Based Conversion to Curative-Intent Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Framework.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Shrinking Giants: On the Feasibility of Downsizing Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Immunotherapy Prior to Liver Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: from patient selection and downstaging to risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Perioperative immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and biomarker-guided strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease and recurrence surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma: current evidence and a translational roadmap.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Functional Interpretation of Recurrent Genetic Variants in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular Consequences and Clinical Relevance.Human mutation · 2026Review
- Tissue and blood-based predictive biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy: synthesis of 2023-2026 evidence and a proposed clinical integration framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA refines risk stratification of neoadjuvant therapy-resistant breast tumors.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Transforming Liver Cancer Therapy: Integrating Molecular Profiling with Precision and Transplant-Based Care.Cancers · 2025Review
- Precision medicine in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: applications and prospects of third-generation sequencing technology.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to validate traditional biomarkers and drug targets in liver cancer recovery: a mini review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high relapse rates after standard-of-care (SOC) resection or liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict relapse/progression risk in patients with HCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective analysis examined real-world data from ctDNA testing on 125 patients with HCC (721 plasma samples) undergoing curative-intent treatments and SOC management. Patients were divided into four subcohorts: cohort A (n = 64) and B (n = 52) comprised patients under recurrence monitoring after LT or resection, respectively. Cohort C (n = 4) and D (n = 5) comprised patients under treatment response monitoring with known recurrence or inoperable disease, respectively. A personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex polymerase chain reaction next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc, Austin, TX) was used for ctDNA testing. The molecular residual disease (MRD) window was defined as 2-12 weeks post-LT/resection (cohorts A/B), before starting adjuvant therapy (AT). Surveillance window was defined as post-MRD window or 2 weeks post-AT (cohort B) or during ongoing treatment (cohorts C/D).
resultsThe median follow-up was 40 (1.5-60) months. In cohort A, 97.2% (35/36) of patients with ctDNA negativity in the MRD window remained negative during surveillance. In cohort B, ctDNA was detected in 29.4% (10/34) of patients within the MRD window, all of whom experienced clinical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 7.2 [95% CI, 2.6 to 20];
conclusionSerial ctDNA testing effectively identified HCC recurrence early, postresection and post-LT. ctDNA was also useful for treatment response monitoring and could help resolve ambiguous imaging results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.