Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding the effect of stay-at-home orders on psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study in Australia.

Patrick Rehill, Roy Barnes, Nicholas Biddle, Ben Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick RehillPOLIS: The Centre for Social Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-5518
Roy BarnesPOLIS: The Centre for Social Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Nicholas BiddleSchool of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Ben EdwardsPOLIS: The Centre for Social Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-5054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraordinary public policy response to COVID-19 in Australia saw extended lockdowns in some Australian states and territories, some of the longest in the world. This paper seeks to understand the effect these periods of lockdown had on the mental health of those living through them. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design we study two different periods - one in 2020, one in 2021. During this time there were some jurisdictions (Victoria, New South Wales and in the second period the Australian Capital Territory) experiencing extended lockdowns while the rest of the country was largely living life as normal with no or low local transmission of the virus. While there seems to have been an effect in this first period, we do not find a statistically measurable effect in 2021 as even though distress rose during the lockdown period, it rose similarly among those jurisdictions out of lockdown as well. We speculate this may be because of adaptation to stress, growing cases in control jurisdictions, or the vaccine roll-out providing a concrete endpoint for lockdowns.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressQuarantineStress, PsychologicalAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40601764
PMCPMC12221174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.