Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601758›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Fundamentals of FAIR biomedical data analyses in the cloud using custom pipelines.

Seth R Berke, Kanika Kanchan, Mary L Marazita, Eric Tobin, Ingo Ruczinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seth R BerkeDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Kanika KanchanDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Mary L MarazitaCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Eric TobinInitial Testing Department, Ethos Laboratories, Newport, Kentucky, United States of America.
Ingo RuczinskiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3278-6274

Funding

Extending the Phenotype of Nonsyndromic Orofacial CleftsR01DE016148 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARAZITA, MARY L., WEINBERG, SETH M · 2004 to 2018
$19.7M
Differences between the sexes among genetic variants affecting orofacial cleft birth defect riskR01DE031855 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARAZITA, MARY L., RUCZINSKI, INGO · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016148NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE031855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the biomedical data ecosystem increasingly embraces the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data principles to publish multimodal datasets to the cloud, opportunities for cloud-based research continue to expand. Besides the potential for accelerated and diverse biomedical discovery that comes from a harmonized data ecosystem, the cloud also presents a shift away from the standard practice of duplicating data to computational clusters or local computers for analysis. However, despite these benefits, researcher migration to the cloud has lagged, in part due to insufficient educational resources to train biomedical scientists on cloud infrastructure. There exists a conceptual lack especially around the crafting of custom analytic pipelines that require software not pre-installed by cloud analysis platforms. We here present three fundamental concepts necessary for custom pipeline creation in the cloud. These overarching concepts are workflow and cloud provider agnostic, extending the utility of this education to serve as a foundation for any computational analysis running any dataset in any biomedical cloud platform. We illustrate these concepts using one of our own custom analyses, a study using the case-parent trio design to detect sex-specific genetic effects on orofacial cleft (OFC) risk, which we crafted in the biomedical cloud analysis platform CAVATICA.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCloud ComputingComputational BiologyData AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleSoftwareWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID40601758
PMCPMC12221167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.