Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Biology exams rarely use visual models to engage higher-order cognitive skills.

Crystal Uminski, Christian Cammarota, Brian A Couch, L Kate Wright, Dina L Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bad AI-generated images can be good for teaching visual literacy in biology.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Crystal UminskiThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-5192
Christian CammarotaThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Brian A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
L Kate WrightThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7379-0224
Dina L NewmanThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual models are a necessary part of molecular biology education because submicroscopic compounds and processes cannot be directly observed. Accurately interpreting the biological information conveyed by the shapes and symbols in these visual models requires engaging visual literacy skills. For students to develop expertise in molecular biology visual literacy, they need to have structured experiences using and creating visual models, but there is little evidence to gauge how often undergraduate biology students are provided such opportunities. To investigate students' visual literacy experiences, we surveyed 66 instructors who taught lower division undergraduate biology courses with a focus on molecular biology concepts. We collected self-reported data about the frequency with which the instructors teach with visual models and we analyzed course exams to determine how instructors incorporated visual models into their assessments. We found that most instructors reported teaching with models in their courses, yet only 16% of exam items in the sample contained a visual model. There was not a statistically significant relationship between instructors' self-reported frequency of teaching with models and extent to which their exams contained models, signaling a potential mismatch between teaching and assessment practices. Although exam items containing models have the potential to elicit higher-order cognitive skills through model-based reasoning, we found that when instructors included visual models in their exams the majority of the items only targeted the lower-order cognitive skills of Bloom's Taxonomy. Together, our findings highlight that despite the importance of visual models in molecular biology, students may not often have opportunities to demonstrate their understanding of these models on assessments.

Indexed as

CognitionEducational MeasurementMolecular BiologyFemaleHumansMaleStudentsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40601675
PMCPMC12221023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.