Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing IDS for the IoMT based on advanced features selection and deep learning methods to increase the model trustworthiness.

Ahmed Muqdad Alnasrallah, Maheyzah Md Siraj, Hanan Ali Alrikabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed Muqdad AlnasrallahFaculty of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-0908
Maheyzah Md SirajFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
Hanan Ali AlrikabiMarshlands Research Center, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information technology has significantly impacted society. IoT and its specialized variant, IoMT, enable remote patient monitoring and improve healthcare. While it contributes to improving healthcare services, it may pose significant security challenges, especially due to the growing interconnectivity of IoMT devices. Hence, a robust IDS is required to handle these issues and prevent future intrusions in a appropriate time. This study proposes an IDS model for the IoMT that integrates advanced feature selection techniques and deep learning to enhance detection performance. The proposed model employs Information Gain (IG) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) in parallel to select the top 50% of features, from which intersection and union subsets are created, followed by a deep autoencoder (DAE) to reduce dimensionality without losing important data. Finally, a deep neural network (DNN) classifies traffic as normal or anomalous. The Experimental results demonstrate superior performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. It achieves an accuracy of 99.93% on the WUSTL-EHMS-2020 dataset while reducing training time and attains 99.61% accuracy on the CICIDS2017 dataset. The model performance was validated with an average accuracy of 99.82% ± 0.16% and a statistically significant p-value of 0.0001 on the WUSTL-EHMS-2020 dataset, which refers to stable statistical improvement. This study indicates that the proposed strategy decreases computational complexity and enhances IDS efficiency in resource-constrained IoMT environments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40601650
PMCPMC12221068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.