ArticlePloS one2025
Perinatal mortality after Chernobyl in former Soviet countries.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DATA AND
methodsPerinatal mortality data for the FSU countries are available in the Health for All database (WHO). In this study, data from Ukraine, Belarus, the Russian Federation, Moldova, and Estonia are analyzed. The regression model uses a long-term exponential trend with flexible time dependence and two superimposed bell-shaped terms (Model 1). In a second approach, the bell-shaped excess terms are replaced by the inverse of gross domestic product per capita (the GDP term), which serves as a proxy for the possible impact of the socio-economic crisis after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The possible strontium exposure of pregnant women (the strontium term) is added as a second covariate (Model 2).
resultsModel 1 fitted the data of all five countries well. The observed increases in PM rates in the 1990s were greater in Belarus than in Ukraine and Russia. Model 2 regressions also fit the data well, except for Ukraine. In Belarus, Russia, and Moldova, the GDP term alone explained the deviation of PM rates from the predicted trend; adding the strontium term did not significantly improve the fit. Only in Ukraine and Estonia was the effect of the strontium term statistically significant. In 1987, increases in PM were found in all countries except Estonia, where PM peaked in 1988.
conclusionThe deviation of PM rates in the 1990s from the long-term trend is related to GDP per capita. An effect of the strontium term is detected only in Ukraine and Estonia, where sharp increases in PM were observed in the early 1990s, well before the trough of GDP in the second half of the 1990s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.