Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The impact of emojis on perceived responsiveness and relationship satisfaction in text messaging.

Eun Huh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eun HuhDepartment of Communication Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2463-8781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partner responsiveness is a key predictor of likability and overall relationship quality, yet its role in digital communication remains insufficiently studied. This study examined how the inclusion of emojis in text messages influences perceptions of responsiveness and, subsequently, likability, closeness, and relationship satisfaction. A sample of 260 participants viewed 15 text-based conversations in which they assumed that they received responses from their friends. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions (e.g., text-only responses or responses that combined text and emojis) for each conversation. Perceptions of responsiveness, likability, closeness, and relationship satisfaction were assessed using pre-established Likert scales. The results showed that messages containing emojis were perceived as more responsive than text-only messages. Perceived responsiveness, in turn, significantly predicted higher ratings of closeness and relationship satisfaction. These findings demonstrate that the influence of partner responsiveness, enhanced through the use of emojis, extends beyond face-to-face interactions into digital interactions. They highlight the critical role of perceived responsiveness in digital contexts and suggest that emojis can enhance relationship satisfaction by acting as nonverbal cues that complement or substitute face-to-face communication.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionText MessagingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40601618
PMCPMC12221085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.