ArticlePloS one2025
Educational improvement through machine learning: Strategic models for better PISA scores.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- School-based music and extracurricular engagement as pathways to adolescent learning and wellbeing: mediating roles of self-regulation and school climate.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Cross-economy stability of predictor rankings for adolescent school belonging and mathematics anxiety: an explainable machine-learning analysis of PISA 2022.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, in addition to traditional variables such as economic wealth or the number of books read, on which many studies have already been conducted, variables that are thought to influence student achievement and better predict success are identified. Random Forest algorithm was used to identify important variables based on the PISA 2018 data, covering all three domains of science, mathematics and reading. The study found that the main factors influencing the success of students in countries that perform well in the PISA exam are essentially access to information technology, weekly hours of instruction in the subject, economic-social and cultural status, parents' occupation, level of metacognition, awareness of PISA, sense of competition and attitudes towards reading. New prediction models based on these variables were proposed. The proposed models will give a significant advantage to policy makers who want to improve their country's PISA score and implement appropriate education policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.