SynthesisPloS one2025
Measles vaccines and non-specific effects on mortality or morbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The origin of non-specific effects of vaccines and the role of randomised clinical trials.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Waning Measles Immunity and Sustained Rubella Seroprotection Among Adults in Istanbul, Türkiye.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Measles Outbreak in Children: Experience of the Children's Hospital of Rabat (2024-2025).Cureus · 2026Article
- Neonatal and infant mortality after maternal influenza and pertussis vaccination: Probabilistically linked cohort study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Commentary: Beneficial non-specific effects of measles vaccine: Fact or fiction?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis review evaluates the hypothesis of beneficial non-specific effects of the standard-titre measles vaccine.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Trials included standard or high-titre live attenuated measles containing vaccines compared to other vaccines or placebo. The primary outcomes were mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes were infections, antibiotic use, atopy, allergies, asthma, and atopic dermatitis.
findings23 articles were included in this systematic review. Mortality: Two doses of measles vaccine vs. only one dose showed no significant effect on mortality; risk ratio (RR) = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.41), p = 0.76. The analysis was based on a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 25% and a control group event rate of 2.32% as measured in the actual trials included in the analysis. In males, the association was rejected: RR = 1.09 (0.86 to 1.37), p = 0.47. In females, the association was not rejected at 25%,but was at 33% level: RR = 1.0 (0.64 to 1.54), p = 0.99. Morbidity: Overall, the hypothesis was rejected: RR = 0.94 (0.80 to 1.10), p = 0.43. The rejection was sustained for both sexes: females RR = 0.95 (0.77 to 1.18), p = 0.6; males RR = 0.92 (0.83 to 1.03), p = 0.13.
interpretationBased on evidence from randomised controlled trials, this systematic literature review and meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis of non-specific effects of standard-titre measles containing vaccines. Trial Sequential Analysis indicated that the meta-analysis included sufficient data to reach this conclusion.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022344473.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.