ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Phenotypic tolerance for rDNA copy number variation within the natural range of C. elegans.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Copy number and sequence variation in ribosomal DNA and the transposon, Pokey, in mutation accumulation lines of Daphnia obtusa.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genes for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are encoded by ribosomal DNA (rDNA), whose structure is notable for being present in arrays of tens to thousands of tandemly repeated copies in eukaryotic genomes. The exact number of rDNA copies per genome is highly variable within a species, with differences between individuals measuring in potentially hundreds of copies and megabases of DNA. The extent to which natural variation in rDNA copy number impacts whole-organism phenotypes such as fitness and lifespan is poorly understood, in part due to difficulties in manipulating such large and repetitive tracts of DNA even in model organisms. Here, we used the natural resource of copy number variation in C. elegans wild isolates to generate new tools and investigated the phenotypic consequences of this variation. Specifically, we generated a panel of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) using a laboratory strain derivative with ~130 haploid rDNA copies and a wild isolate with ~417 haploid rDNA copies, one of the highest validated C. elegans rDNA copy number arrays. We find that rDNA copy number is stable in the RILs, rejecting prior hypotheses that predicted copy number instability and copy number reversion. To isolate effects of rDNA copy number on phenotype, we produced a series of near isogenic lines (NILs) with rDNA copy numbers representing the high and low end of the rDNA copy number spectrum in C. elegans wild isolates. We find no correlation between rDNA copy number and phenotypes of rRNA abundance, competitive fitness, early life fertility, lifespan, or global transcriptome under standard laboratory conditions. These findings demonstrate a remarkable ability of C. elegans to tolerate substantial variation in a locus critical to fundamental cell function. Our study provides strain resources for future investigations into the boundaries of this tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.