ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Quantitative CUT&Tag for Epigenomic Profiling of Mouse Germ Cells.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Newly Evolved Endogenous Retroviruses Prime the Ovarian Reserve for Activation.Research square · 2025Article
- Newly Evolved Endogenous Retroviruses Prime the Ovarian Reserve for Activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The SMARCA5-DMRT1 Pioneer Complex Establishes Epigenetic Priming to Direct Male Germline Development.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide chromatin profiling is a robust approach to define the mechanisms underlying epigenetic gene regulation. Among the available techniques, Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) has emerged as a highly efficient method for profiling diverse chromatin components and modifications. Its appeal lies in the simplicity of the experimental steps, the minimal input requirements, and the generation of reproducible high-quality data. Here, we provide a detailed guide to a series of optimized spike-in CUT&Tag protocols tailored for quantitative epigenomic profiling of mouse germ cells. We illustrate this application of the methodology using our recent comprehensive study of adult mouse spermatogonial cells as an example. The experimental process involves fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate adult spermatogonial cells, the implementation of a spike-in CUT&Tag protocol to generate sequencing libraries, and the subsequent bioinformatics analysis of the resulting sequencing data. This framework provides a versatile approach to quantitative epigenomic analysis, extending far beyond the specific context of male germ cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40601268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.