ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Profiling Histone Modifications in Differentiating Mouse Spermatogonia with CUT&Tag.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paternal histone modifications are extensively remodeled during mammalian spermatogenesis. This remodeling is significant because histone modifications encode gene regulatory information important for fertility and potentially for development in the next generation. Most insight into these epigenetic changes has been gleaned from chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq analysis of male germ cells during the meiotic and postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis due to their abundance in seminiferous tubules and long-standing methods for their purification. However, there is a paucity of research defining the epigenetic landscape of earlier spermatogenic populations, including spermatogonia, mainly because cell yields are low after purification, resulting in suboptimal conditions for ChIP-seq experiments. The recent emergence of Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) as a tool to profile genome-wide histone modifications in low numbers of cells offers promising opportunities to overcome the limitations of ChIP-seq analysis in spermatogonia. Here, we describe a protocol that combines fluorescence-activated cell sorting with an optimized CUT&Tag workflow for as few as 50,000 dissociated, sorted cells to generate high-quality and reproducible datasets that faithfully capture enrichment of histone modifications in differentiating spermatogonia. This protocol will enable researchers to investigate the epigenetics of premeiotic cells in the male germ line easily and robustly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40601267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.