ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Perceptions of health care providers involved in organ donation or transplantation on cardiac donation after death by circulatory criteria: a qualitative study.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Abdominal Organ Transplant Access.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCardiac donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) can be performed using either 1) direct procurement and perfusion of ex situ organs or 2) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the acceptability and ethics of these procedures, particularly NRP in which the blood supply to the brain is surgically interrupted and circulation in the thorax and abdomen is restored prior to heart retrieval. We aimed to understand the perspectives on cardiac donation following DCC of Canadian clinicians who are involved in donation and transplantation.
methodsWe performed a qualitative descriptive study of 75 clinicians to better understand the perspectives of physicians on cardiac DCC. We purposively sampled clinicians who care for organ donors (N = 51) and those who care for transplant recipients (N = 24) in Canada. We performed thematic analysis to generate themes describing participants' perspectives about cardiac DCC and its implementation in Canada.
resultsWe found that the broad support and interest to implement cardiac DCC among the cohort of clinicians interviewed was tempered by their anticipation that other clinicians, donor families, and the public would be less supportive. Donor clinicians were particularly concerned about potential erosion in public trust in the organ donation system as a whole. Participants identified opportunities to address anticipated challenges, including strategies for education and communication around cardiac DCC, staged/gradual introduction of cardiac DCC, and the option for stakeholders (clinicians, donor families, potential transplant recipients) to opt out of participation in cardiac DCC.
conclusionsIn this qualitative study of clinicians involved in organ donation or transplantation across Canada, we found broad support for cardiac DCC. Nevertheless, we observed several challenges with the implementation of cardiac DCC, particularly concerns of nonsupport by other stakeholders. Participants also identified opportunities to address anticipated barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40601238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.