Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40601232›Full record

SynthesisJournal of endocrinological investigation2025

Global epidemiology of pheochromocytoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Giacomo Vitturi, Salvatore Crisafulli, Ylenia Alessi, Sara Frontalini, Marilisa Giustina Stano, Andrea Fontana, Giuseppe Giuffrida, Francesco Ferraù, Gianluca Trifirò, Salvatore Cannavò

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giacomo Vitturi *Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore Crisafulli *Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ylenia AlessiDepartment of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Sara FrontaliniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marilisa Giustina StanoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea FontanaUnit of Biostatistics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Giuseppe GiuffridaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Francesco FerraùEndocrine Unit, University Hospital G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy. fferrau@unime.it.
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore CannavòEndocrine Unit, University Hospital G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017N8CK4K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies is to provide an overview of the global epidemiology of pheochromocytomas and to evaluate the quality of study reporting for the identified studies.

methodsTwo bibliographic databases, PubMed and Embase, were searched for studies assessing the epidemiology of pheochromocytoma from inception until December 2024. Original observational studies written in English and reporting pheochromocytoma prevalence and/or incidence for a well-defined geographic area were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles for inclusion, extracted relevant data, and carried out the evaluation of the quality of study reporting. A narrative synthesis of the results was provided, along with a meta-analysis of both prevalence and incidence of pheochromocytoma.

resultsA total of 14 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 13 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of pheochromocytoma was 19.8 (95% CI: 9.6-40.8) cases per 1,000,000 individuals, and the incidence rate was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2-2.6) cases per million person-years. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed for both prevalence and incidence rates (I

conclusionsOverall, our systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies revealed significant between-study heterogeneity of prevalence of pheochromocytoma amounting to around 20 per million individuals. Establishing national registries using standardized diagnostic and clinical parameters, along with well-defined selection and analysis criteria, may provide better insight into the epidemiology and the course of this rare disease.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsPheochromocytomaGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceObservational Studies as TopicPrevalenceEpidemiologyMeta-analysisPheochromocytomaSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.