ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Neuroprotective effect of ripasudil on retinal ganglion cells via an antioxidative mechanism.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Blood Flow in Eyes with Myopia and Glaucoma: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination in secondary glaucoma associated with uveitis: a retrospective study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Possible Effects of Topical Rho-Kinase Inhibitor on Schlemm's Canal Morphology Parameters.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the neuroprotective effect of ripasudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor that is a commercially available glaucoma medication that lowers intraocular pressure. We explored the effects of ripasudil on retinal damage via oxidative stress (OS) in primary rat retinal ganglion cell (RGC) cultures and NMDA-induced retinal damage in mice. STUDY
designExperimental investigation
methodsPrimary rat RGCs were isolated via a 2-step immunopanning method and cultured under normal cultivation conditions for 72 h and for a further 24 h in antioxidant-free medium for OS. We measured the number of living RGCs by use of calcein-AM and calpain activity via calpain immunoreactivity assays. Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of ripasudil via RGC counting in retinal flat-mounts from Thy1-CFP mice, retinal thickness via optical coherence tomography, and reduced glutathione levels via GSSG/GSH assays in NMDA-induced retinal damage.
resultsThe living RGC counts of normal, OS, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 uM ripasudil under OS were 236.0 ± 21.6, 155.0 ± 13.2, 155.9 ± 17.1, 158.9 ± 12.0, 184.8 ± 26.9, and 201.1 ± 24.8 cells, respectively. 10 or 100 uM ripasudil significantly inhibited the OS-induced RGC reduction (P < 0.05 or 0.01). Furthermore, the enhanced calpain activity induced by OS was suppressed by 100 uM ripasudil (P < 0.05). In an in vivo study, the RGC counts in the NMDA-treated group were lower than those of the non-NMDA-treated group. NMDA-induced RGC loss was significantly suppressed by ripasudil (P < 0.01). Retinal thinning after 3 weeks of NMDA injection was also inhibited by ripasudil (P < 0.01 or 0.05). Furthermore, NMDA increased the glutathione level, whereas ripasudil suppressed it (P < 0.05).
conclusionsRipasudil may have neuroprotective effects via an antioxidative mechanism, which could be useful as an intraocular pressure-independent additive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.