ArticleBiogerontology2025
Comparison of MSCs and Muse cells: the possible use for healthspan optimization.
Article in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Window for Intravenous Human Muse Cell Administration in Mouse Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Muse-like stem cell therapy for curing chronic diseases in geriatric feline and canine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the bio-safety of HuMSCs and HuMenSCs in the nude mice and their impacts on reproductive organs' histological morphology.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exploration for safe, effective intervention strategies to improve longevity and aging-related diseases is attracting attention to prolong the healthy lifespan. Since aging is based on cellular changes, including telomere attrition, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction, therapies related to stem cells are expected to be a rational strategy for solving aging problems at the cellular level. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an easily accessible, safe candidate, as they supply paracrine factors and extracellular vesicles to deliver pleiotropic effects for aging tissues. Multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells represent endogenous, reparative macrophage-like/pluripotent-like stem cells distributed in various tissues, including extraembryonic tissues such as the umbilical cord, and are also found in MSCs as a small percentage of the total population. Muse cell characteristics are different from those of MSCs. Intravenously injected Muse cells sharply sense the universal damage signal sphingosine-1-P and selectively migrate to damaged tissue rather than being trapped in the lung, phagocytose damaged/apoptotic cells in the tissue and directly differentiate into the same cell type. Muse cells then repair the three dimensional structure of the tissue by replacing multiple tissue component with healthy cells through pluripotent-like differentiation. Clinical trials have shown that HLA-mismatched donor Muse cells escape immune rejection and survive in the recipient tissue for an extended period without immunosuppressant treatment. Therefore, the pleiotropic bystander effects of Muse cells are more potent than those of MSCs. Due to heterogeneity, the properties of MSCs are still not fully understood; they have limited differentiation ability into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic cells, and the main biological action in vivo is bystander effects. Muse cells are key, not only to the medical benefits of MSCs, but also to their potential use in anti-aging therapy. Enriching and purifying Muse cells will significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of MSCs, leading to further expansion of the use of MSCs. This review discusses the fundamental differences between MSCs and Muse cells and their potential applications in anti-aging therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.