ArticleCell regeneration (London, England)2025
Impact of exercise-induced alterations on gut microbiota diversity and composition: comparing effects of different training modalities.
Article in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut-heart axis at high altitude: a dynamic mediator from hypoxic dysbiosis to adaptive cardioprotection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota of sprint athletes: signature microbes and dietary links.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The brain-gut-muscle axis: a mechanism for exercise-mediated protection in brain aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Exercise and Diet Reshape Athletes' Gut Microbiota: Countering Health Challenges in Athletes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Application of Exercise/Training Models to Evaluate Food Functionality with Special Focus on Preventing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress and Enhancing Exercise Performance.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise has been shown to influence gut microbiota composition, but the specific effects of different exercise modalities on microbial diversity remain unclear. Understanding these differences is essential for optimizing exercise programs to enhance both physical fitness and gut health. This study compared the gut microbiota profiles of participants undergoing moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Thirty-one previously untrained healthy university students were randomly assigned into MICT (n = 7), HIIT (n = 12) and HIFT (n = 12). The results revealed that distinct gut microbiome profiles in participants under different exercise modes. Notably, the alpha-diversity gradually increased from the MICT group to the HIFT group. In addition, there was a progressive shift towards a Faecalibacterium-dominated microbial type from HIIT to HIFT group compared to MICT group. Individuals in the HIFT group were identified to be enriched with Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, along with reduced Actinomyces and Anaeromassilibacillus. Functionally, the KEGG pathway and enzyme analysis using PICRUST2 revealed that the HIFT group exhibited prominence in muscle function-related pathways and enzymes, specifically ko00280 (valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation), as well as the enzyme EC: 3.4.11.14 (alanine aminopeptidase). In conclusion, these findings highlight how exercise modality influences gut microbial diversity, with HIFT promoting a more favorable microbial profile compared to traditional endurance training. Understanding these effects can help tailor exercise programs to improve both fitness and gut health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.