ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2025
What is the appropriate antibiotic administration to prevent MRONJ development after tooth extraction?
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are no established guidelines for antibiotic administration to prevent the development of medication related-osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) after tooth extraction in patients receiving antiresorptive agents (ARAs). Since 2022, the duration of antibiotic administration during extractions in such patients has been intentionally shortened to prevent antimicrobial resistance at our hospitals.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 160 patients on low-dose bisphosphonates (BPs) requiring tooth extractions between 2019 and 2024 at four Japanese institutions. In 2019-2021, patients received amoxicillin (AMPC) 500 mg 1 h before and 750 mg per day for 2 days post-extraction. In 2022-2024, a single 500 mg dose of AMPC was administered 1 h pre-extraction. Patients were managed with tension-free wound suturing and regular follow-up. The rates of MRONJ development were compared between the two periods.
resultsMRONJ developed in 3 out of 170 teeth (1.76%) in 2019-2021, and in 2 out of 147 teeth (1.36%) in 2022-2024, with no significant difference (P = 1.000). All MRONJ cases were low-stage (Stage 1) and healed completely within 12-16 weeks. Four out of five MRONJ cases (80%) exhibited radiopaque changes around the root. When all teeth in both groups were surveyed, MRONJ development was significantly higher in teeth with such changes compared to those without (4/58 vs. 1/259; P = 0.004).
conclusionA single preoperative dose of AMPC may be sufficient for tooth extractions in patients on low-dose BPs. However, teeth with radiopaque changes around the root require careful monitoring postextraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.