ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Defining new radiological patterns to improve classification of Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult and pediatric cystic nephroma: an easily misdiagnosed renal tumor.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to compare Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses (CRM) using Bosniak classification version 2005 (BC-v2005) versus BC-v2019 and analyze radiological findings and patterns of benignity and malignancy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all Bosniak III-IV CRMs using BC-v2005 at our center with four-phase CT confirmed pathology, between January 2014 and June 2019. Two radiologists independently re-evaluated each lesion using both BCs, including findings of benignity and malignancy. Bosniak III-IV CRMs were classified in four radiological patterns: inflammatory (CRM-IP), cystic nephroma (CRM-CNP), papillary (CRM-PP), and clear cell (CRM-CCP). Characteristics of patterns were compared.
resultsOut of 97 patients, 57 Bosniak III-IV CRMs met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four (42.10%) lesions were reclassified as solid tumours using BC-v2019. Any lesion was downgraded to IIF or lower. Nine (15.78%) lesions were upgraded to Bosniak III-IV CRMs by BC-v2019, despite benign lesions. The presence of acute-angle nodules was the only statistically significant sign of malignancy (p < 0.01). All benign lesions, not considered solid, were included in the two patterns of benignity, characterized by thickened septa and/or wall and without acute-angle nodules. All malignant CRMs presented two patterns of malignancy, proposed as acute-angle nodules. All clear cell carcinomas presented with hyperenhancing acute-angle nodules in the arterial phase. Pattern classification was better for BC-v2005 and BC-v2029, differentiating benign and malignant CRM.
conclusionThe proposed four radiological patterns improved performance than BC-v2019 in classifying benign lesions (CRM-IP and CRM-CNP) and malignant ones (CRM-PP and CRM-CCP), with wall and septa thickening and acute-angle nodules as relevant biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.