Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600780›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Multi-Species Impacts of Invasive Opuntia Cacti on Mammal Habitat Use.

Peter S Stewart, Russell A Hill, Ayub M O Oduor, Philip A Stephens, Mark J Whittingham, Wayne Dawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter S StewartSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-6279
Russell A HillDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7601-5802
Ayub M O OduorDepartment of Biological and Life Sciences, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6714-5253
Philip A StephensDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-788X
Mark J WhittinghamSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-3454
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-0774

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Iapetus2 Doctoral Training Partnership
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions impact ecosystems worldwide, including through changing the behaviour of native species. Here, we used camera traps to investigate the effects of invasive Opuntia spp. on the habitat use of 12 mammal species in Laikipia County, Kenya, an internationally important region of mammalian biodiversity. We found that Opuntia impacted mammal occupancy and activity. These effects were evident when Opuntia was considered at both site level and landscape scales; however, some mammal species showed different responses to increasing Opuntia at these two scales. The effects of Opuntia were generally context dependent, with their strength and direction varying among mammal species and between seasons. As well as having important implications for mammal conservation, ecosystem functioning and the future spread of Opuntia, our findings highlight behavioural changes in large mammals as a potentially important pathway through which invasive species impact ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesMammalsOpuntiaAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesKenyaactivityanimal behaviourbehavioural effectsbiological invasionscamera trapscausal inferenceinvasive plantsoccupancy

Identifiers

PMID40600780
PMCPMC12218864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.