Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600650›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre-eclampsia prediction at 11-14 weeks in an Australian population.

Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Roshan Selvaratnam, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Andrew McLennan, Jon Hyett, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. First-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofonyas Abebaw TirunehMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-5105
Daniel Lorber RolnikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-3592
Roshan SelvaratnamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Fabricio da Silva CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew McLennanSydney Ultrasound for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jon HyettIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8019-1289
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-577X
Joanne EnticottMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-5690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11-14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre-eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false-positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.

resultsOf 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre-eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30-38) years. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA-PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP-A compared to those without pre-eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP-A use. Preterm pre-eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.

conclusionsThe Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk-based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaAdultAustraliaBiomarkersFemaleHumansPlacenta Growth FactorPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-APregnancy Trimester, FirstRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUterine ArteryBiomarkersPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-AFetal Medicine Foundationmean arterial pressureplacental growth factorpredictionpre‐eclampsiapregnancy‐associated plasma protein auterine artery Pulsatility index

Identifiers

PMID40600650
PMCPMC12393981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.