ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre-eclampsia prediction at 11-14 weeks in an Australian population.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Clinical Outcomes Related to Preeclampsia: Real-World Impacts of Implementation of a Redesigned Approach to Antenatal Care-The Initial Maternity Assessment and Planning (IMAP) Service.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Models and the FMF Competing-Risks Algorithm for First-Trimester Preeclampsia Screening in a Romanian Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First-trimester prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Article
- Plasma RNA-Based Dual Screening for Early/Extreme Spontaneous Preterm Birth and Early Onset Preeclampsia to Enable Prevention.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre-eclampsia prediction at 11-14 weeks in an Australian population.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Association of Placental Growth Factor with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study in Chinese pregnant women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11-14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre-eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false-positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.
resultsOf 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre-eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30-38) years. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA-PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP-A compared to those without pre-eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP-A use. Preterm pre-eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.
conclusionsThe Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk-based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.