ReviewCurrent drug targets2025
Targeting Creatine and Creatine Kinase in Cancer: Exploring Potential Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in Current drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and interpretability of a machine learning-derived model for the identification of latent prostate cancer in patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The MicroRNAs-STAT3-cyclophilin D-cell apoptosis axis: a novel pathway for phosphocreatine treatment in heart disease.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creatine kinases (CKs) are a family of vital enzymes implicated in the domain of cellular bioenergy, fulfilling a pivotal role in facilitating the reversible transfer of phosphoryl groups between adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and creatine. This process plays a crucial role in maintaining optimal ATP levels during energy-demanding processes, a requirement that is amplified in rapidly proliferating cells, including cancerous cells. CKs are pivotal in supporting cancer growth and metastasis, making their inhibition a promising therapeutic strategy. The present review discusses a few ways of disrupting the creatine energy production cycle with emphasis on three main areas of research: First, we consider the different strategies that attack the Creatine Transporter (SLC6A8). Since this transporter facilitates the entry of creatine into the cell, it is expected that inhibiting this transporter may lead to reduced availability of creatine for CK-mediated energy production. Second, strategies aimed at directly inhibiting the enzyme carrying out the creatine phosphorylation are described. Lastly, we consider approaches targeting the backward reaction, i.e., the re-conversion of phosphocreatine to creatine and, thereby, the equilibrium of the CK reaction. The current review gives an overview of the structure-activity and structure-property relationships of the currently available CK inhibitors. Understanding these relations in depth is a prerequisite for developing new and more potent and selective CK inhibitors. This review focuses on an in-depth analysis to create better CK inhibitors with possible applications in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40600548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.