Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600455›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Comparative Effectiveness of Individual, Group, Family and Combined Therapy Formats on Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis.

Nikki Lyka van Eijk, Renske Gilissen, Daan Creemers, Lizanne J S Schweren, Wouter van Ballegooijen

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikki Lyka van Eijk113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-0018
Renske Gilissen113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daan CreemersRadboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lizanne J S Schweren113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wouter van BallegooijenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9189-6695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through carefully choosing psychotherapeutic interventions based on treatment characteristics, we may increase the relatively small effect sizes for suicidal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different psychotherapy formats in reducing suicidal ideation and attempts, including individual, group and family-based therapies, as well as combined modalities involving individual and group or individual and family interventions. We conducted a meta-analysis after systematically searching databases for randomised controlled trials up to April 1, 2024. Included studies targeted any mental health issue, were delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reported on suicidal ideation or attempts. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers, and a mixed-effects model was used for data synthesis. One hundred and seventy-two studies were eligible, totalling 198 comparisons with a total of 22,440 participants. Individual therapy significantly reduced suicidal ideation (g = -0.33, p < 0.001, k = 72 comparisons), as did group therapy (g = -0.39, p < 0.001, k = 27 comparisons). For reducing suicide attempts, individual therapy (RR = 0.75, p < 0.001, k = 63 comparisons), and notably, combinations of individual with group (RR = 0.42, p = 0.010, k = 7 comparisons) and individual with family-based therapy (RR = 0.59, p = 0.041, k = 8 comparisons) were effective. Subgroup analysis showed that combined therapies were associated with larger effect sizes compared to single modalities in reducing suicide attempts (p < 0.001). This meta-analysis highlights that combined psychotherapy approaches, integrating individual sessions with group or family sessions, yields significantly higher effect sizes, reducing the risk of suicide attempts by 50%. These findings support the adoption of combined therapeutic strategies in clinical settings to effectively address suicidality. SUMMARY: Individual or group therapy is effective for reducing suicidal ideation. Family therapy seems less effective than other formats. Individual therapy, or combining individual therapy with group therapy or family therapy, is effective for preventing suicide attempts. A combination of individual therapy with group or family therapy seems more effective at preventing suicide attempts than other formats.

Indexed as

Family TherapyPsychotherapyPsychotherapy, GroupSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionCombined Modality TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuicide, AttemptedTreatment Outcomefamily therapygroup therapymeta‐analysispsychotherapysuicide

Identifiers

PMID40600455
PMCPMC12217431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.