ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Delivering Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT-T) for Eating Disorders: Examining Real-World Outcomes of a Large-Scale Training Program.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The weight concerns scale in Australian adolescents: Factor structure, gender invariance, and screening utility.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predictive Validity of Purging Disorder: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study Comparing Prevalence and Psychosocial Outcomes for Alternative Criteria Sets.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Psilocybin Treatment as an Adjunct to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Eating Disorders: Therapeutic Rationale & Considerations for Protocol Development.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Delivering Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT-T) for Eating Disorders: Examining Real-World Outcomes of a Large-Scale Training Program.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCognitive Behavioral Therapy-Ten (CBT-T) is a 10-session manualized eating disorder (ED) treatment protocol for nonunderweight EDs. CBT-T was developed to increase access to treatment and reduce wait times, as it can be delivered in half the time as existing CBT approaches for EDs. To improve access to treatment, the Nova Scotia Eating Disorder Provincial Service trained 36 clinicians through a 10-month CBT-T training program and offered CBT-T provincially. This study examines changes in ED psychopathology, binge eating, compensatory behaviors, anxiety, and depression in a transdiagnostic cohort of adult patients treated with CBT-T. Further, an exploratory analysis of predictors of treatment outcome was conducted.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on adults who began CBT-T between July 2022 and March 2024. Participants completed routine outcome measures per the CBT-T manual. Mixed-effects models examined symptom changes over time, along with predictors of treatment outcome, dropout, and extension.
resultsA total of 267 patients started CBT-T. Significant reductions in ED psychopathology, binge eating, and compensatory behaviors, anxiety, and depression were observed throughout treatment. Effect sizes were large to very large at the end of treatment for primary and secondary outcomes. Early change in ED psychopathology predicted better outcomes, whereas diagnoses of anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa were associated with higher dropout rates. DISCUSSION: Findings support that CBT-T may be an effective, scalable treatment associated with significant symptom reductions corresponding to large effect sizes. Future research should explore adaptations to improve retention, especially for those with anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.