Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Differences in pain, bleeding, and satisfaction during medical abortion at very early gestations.
Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03989869 (Very Early Medical Abortion - a Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Very Early Medical Abortion - a Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in pain, bleeding, and satisfaction during medical abortion at very early gestations.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLittle is known regarding the impact of gestation on pain, bleeding duration, and satisfaction in early medical abortion (termination of pregnancy). This study aimed to determine if pain experience, bleeding duration, and overall satisfaction with medical abortion differed across four ultrasound-defined categories of early pregnancy. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the multicenter VEMA-trial, a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of very early medical abortion before confirming pregnancy location (the VEMA-trial, EudraCT 2018-003675-35, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989869). The present study included participants with normally developing pregnancies and known abortion outcomes, including complete abortion, incomplete abortion, and ongoing pregnancy, that is, pregnancy still progressing after medical abortion. Participants were grouped by ultrasound findings at the time of abortion into pregnancy of unknown location, early, normally sited pregnancy (empty sac), and normally sited pregnancy with visible yolk sac or visible embryo. Pain experience was measured on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (higher values for more pain), duration of bleeding in days, and satisfaction on a 0-6 scale (higher values indicating greater satisfaction).
resultsAltogether 1253 participants were included: 18% (224 participants) with pregnancy of unknown location, 38% (476) with early, normally sited pregnancy, 24% (301) with visible yolk sac, and 20% (252) with visible embryo. Pain scores were lowest in the pregnancy of unknown location group (mean 5.2 ± SD 2.3) and highest in the pregnancy with visible embryo group (6.2 ± 2.4). Bleeding duration was shortest for pregnancies of unknown location (4.9 ± 3.2) and longest for those with visible embryo (7.5 ± 5.3). Mean satisfaction was over 5 in all groups, highest in early, normally sited pregnancies (5.7 ± 0.7). In regression analyses, both pain scores and bleeding duration increased with advancing ultrasound findings. The pregnancy of unknown location group reported the least pain (1.02 points lower, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.46 to -0.57) and the shortest bleeding duration (34% shorter, incidence rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.71) compared to pregnancies with visible embryo.
conclusionsMore advanced ultrasound findings are associated with higher pain scores and longer bleeding duration in very early medical abortion, whereas satisfaction is high across ultrasound-defined categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.