Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600383›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Differences in pain, bleeding, and satisfaction during medical abortion at very early gestations.

Frida Gyllenberg, Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, Helena Kopp Kallner, John Reynolds-Wright, Clare Boerma, Sharon Cameron, Helena Hognert, Oskari Heikinheimo, Janina Kaislasuo and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03989869 (Very Early Medical Abortion - a Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03989869 nacompletednot on this map

Very Early Medical Abortion - a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS LothianRan2019 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsAbortion EarlyArmsImmediate treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Frida GyllenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-5948
Karin BrandellDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-3374
Tagrid Jar-AllahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helena Kopp KallnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
John Reynolds-WrightCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Clare BoermaFamily Planning Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon CameronCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Helena HognertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2405-0662
Oskari HeikinheimoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-130X
Janina KaislasuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-1444

Funding

European Society of Contraception and Reproductive HealthGothenburg Society of MedicineHospital System of Helsinki and UusimaaKarolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm ALF 2022-2025Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and GynecologySwedish Reasarch Council 2017-00205Swedish Reasarch Council 2021-01042The Hjalmar Svensson Foundation HSV2024011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle is known regarding the impact of gestation on pain, bleeding duration, and satisfaction in early medical abortion (termination of pregnancy). This study aimed to determine if pain experience, bleeding duration, and overall satisfaction with medical abortion differed across four ultrasound-defined categories of early pregnancy. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the multicenter VEMA-trial, a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of very early medical abortion before confirming pregnancy location (the VEMA-trial, EudraCT 2018-003675-35, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989869). The present study included participants with normally developing pregnancies and known abortion outcomes, including complete abortion, incomplete abortion, and ongoing pregnancy, that is, pregnancy still progressing after medical abortion. Participants were grouped by ultrasound findings at the time of abortion into pregnancy of unknown location, early, normally sited pregnancy (empty sac), and normally sited pregnancy with visible yolk sac or visible embryo. Pain experience was measured on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (higher values for more pain), duration of bleeding in days, and satisfaction on a 0-6 scale (higher values indicating greater satisfaction).

resultsAltogether 1253 participants were included: 18% (224 participants) with pregnancy of unknown location, 38% (476) with early, normally sited pregnancy, 24% (301) with visible yolk sac, and 20% (252) with visible embryo. Pain scores were lowest in the pregnancy of unknown location group (mean 5.2 ± SD 2.3) and highest in the pregnancy with visible embryo group (6.2 ± 2.4). Bleeding duration was shortest for pregnancies of unknown location (4.9 ± 3.2) and longest for those with visible embryo (7.5 ± 5.3). Mean satisfaction was over 5 in all groups, highest in early, normally sited pregnancies (5.7 ± 0.7). In regression analyses, both pain scores and bleeding duration increased with advancing ultrasound findings. The pregnancy of unknown location group reported the least pain (1.02 points lower, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.46 to -0.57) and the shortest bleeding duration (34% shorter, incidence rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.71) compared to pregnancies with visible embryo.

conclusionsMore advanced ultrasound findings are associated with higher pain scores and longer bleeding duration in very early medical abortion, whereas satisfaction is high across ultrasound-defined categories.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPatient SatisfactionUterine HemorrhageAdultFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstUltrasonography, Prenatal1st trimesterbleedingmedical abortionmifepristonemisoprostolpainsatisfactionVEMA

Identifiers

PMID40600383
PMCPMC12393991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.