Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600382›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2025

Early Outcomes of Primary Graft Dysfunction Comparing Donation After Circulatory and Brain Death Heart Transplantation: An Analysis of the UNOS Registry.

Ye In Christopher Kwon, Michael Keller, Kareem Elhigzi, Iman Adibi, Holly Caboti Jones, Alan Lai, Andrew Min-Gi Park, Inna F Tchoukina, Keyur B Shah, Zachary Fitch and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ye In Christopher KwonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4556-1931
Michael KellerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6104-0692
Kareem ElhigziDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3979-5118
Iman AdibiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6746-4824
Holly Caboti JonesDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3601-0865
Alan LaiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4984-999X
Andrew Min-Gi ParkDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5572-1822
Inna F TchoukinaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1587-1998
Keyur B ShahDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-2963
Zachary FitchDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-1513
Patricia NicolatoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Josue CheryDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2333-1507
Mohammed QuaderDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-043X
Vigneshwar KasirajanDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1974-7951
Zubair A HashmiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8907-1210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary graft dysfunction (PGD) represents a leading cause of mortality in patients undergoing donation after brain death (DBD) orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), requiring timely escalation to mechanical circulatory support. There is a lack of nationwide data regarding PGD after donation after circulatory death (DCD). Here, we evaluated the incidence and short-term outcomes of PGD following DCD.

methodsUsing the UNOS registry between 9/2023 and 9/2024, we identified all adult (≥18 years) recipients of OHT. The incidence and outcomes of moderate-severe PGD (24- and 72-h post-transplant) were compared between DCD and DBD. Predictors for mortality after PGD were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. 30-day survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsA total of 5017 patients underwent first-time OHT, among whom 762 (15.2%) received DCD hearts. DCD had a significantly higher incidence of PGD at 24- (7.9% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.001) and 72-h (5.9% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.001) compared to DBD. 30-day (p = 0.3068) survival was not different between DCD and DBD patients with PGD. Similarly, for recipients with PGD at 72 h, 30-day (p = 0.327) survival was comparable. At 72 h, DCD recipients were more likely to be supported on ECMO (p = 0.016). Transplanting DCD organs did not impact PGD-associated mortality at 24- (HR 0.72, p = 0.442) and 72-h (HR 0.74, p = 0.457). Postoperative ECMO was associated with decreased risk of PGD-associated mortality in DCD recipients at 24- (p < 0.0001) and 72-h (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsWhile PGD rates appear higher in DCD, the associated mortality remains comparable to that of DBD. Early support on ECMO may confer survival benefits in DCD recipients with PGD.

Indexed as

Brain DeathGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsPrimary Graft DysfunctionRegistriesTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Ageddonation after brain deathdonation after circulatory deathheart transplantprimary graft dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40600382
PMCPMC12216797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.