ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Clustering crocodylian dental morphology: Insights into functional adaptations, diet, and ontogeny.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clustering crocodylian dental morphology: Insights into functional adaptations, diet, and ontogeny.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crocodylians have often been grouped into ecomorphological categories based on snout characters and diet, but quantitative dental morphology has rarely been used for this purpose. We collected Euclidean measurements from the teeth of 18 extant crocodylian species spanning a range of sizes and snout ecomorphotypes, normalized the data for size heterodonty using regression analyses, grouped the crowns into eight dental sections along the arcade, and ran a K-means cluster analysis to cluster individuals based on shape heterodonty. Five clusters emerged, each reflecting different degrees of gracility or robustness of crowns and their variation along the jaw arcade. These morphological clusters showed a connection to snout shape, prey preference, and feeding ecology, particularly prey size and the degree of processing necessary. Cluster assignments were, for the most part, not taxon specific; multiple families and subfamilies were found in most clusters, and members of the same species were often found in more than one cluster. For species with members in multiple clusters, the larger individuals typically were in the cluster with more robust crowns. This supports prior suggestions that dental morphotype coincides with ontogenetic niche shifts. This approach demonstrates the potential for using dental morphology to infer ecological roles in both extant and fossil crocodylians, paving the way for future comparative analyses of archosaur dentition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.