Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600195›Full record

ReviewEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal2025

Recent Development in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Gas Hydrates in Flow Assurance.

Parisa Naeiji, Mengdi Pan, Judith M Schicks, Niall J English

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Energy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parisa NaeijiSchool of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-5510
Mengdi PanSchool of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0632-1799
Judith M SchicksGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1106-0693
Niall J EnglishSchool of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-3540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient production of oil and gas is paramount to meet global energy demands, necessitating a focus on flow assurance in pipelines. Gas hydrate formation, along with other issues, like corrosion and deposition, poses significant threats to fluid transportation systems in pipelines, leading to significant economic and safety risks. Various operational and chemical strategies have been developed to mitigate hydrate formation in oil and gas pipelines, but challenges remain in terms of cost-effectiveness and environmental impact. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer a promising avenue for understanding hydrate behavior and designing effective inhibition strategies. This review consolidates current knowledge on MD simulations of gas hydrates, focusing on their application in flow assurance. By examination of recent advancements and challenges, this review aims to foster innovative strategies and technologies for ensuring the reliability, safety, and sustainability of hydrocarbon transportation systems in gas hydrate-prone environments.

Identifiers

PMID40600195
PMCPMC12207591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.