ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2025
Alpha-Gal Syndrome: Often Hidden, Under-Recognized, and in Need of Attention-A Rapid Review.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Side Effect: Immuno-Ethical Risk Analysis of Animal-Derived Ingredients in Pharmaceuticals.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS), a tick-borne allergy, is increasing as its vectors migrate throughout the US and the world. There were an estimated 450,000 cases in the US. AGS reactions to mammalian foods and medical products include delayed anaphylaxis, urticaria, gastrointestinal and cardiac symptoms often difficult to connect to the source. Despite its seriousness, provider knowledge is limited. This rapid review investigated published works on AGS from 2020 to 24; it also sought to determine the breadth of AGs publications across different fields and specialties. We identified 355 studies of AGS diagnosis and management from 2020 to 2024 via Cochrane Central, Medline via the PubMed interface, and Embase (additional grey literature via Web of Science and Google Scholar). Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using JBI critical appraisal tools. Two hundred and nineteen studies met the criteria. One hundred and sixty-eight (77%) were full studies; 51 (23%) were conference presentations. Studies remained largely confined to allergy and immunology literature, despite their implications for other organ systems. Although patients present with symptoms to emergency departments and dermatology clinics there is a paucity of literature in those fields and others; several studies document practitioners' lack of knowledge. Inclusion of content within medical school curricula is needed to establish foundational knowledge on the topic. With the increase in patients presenting with AGS, and with the reach of AGS across multiple fields, physicians and other health care providers need to be able to diagnose and then manage AGS with their patients. This rapid review has documented the problem of silos in disseminating information about AGS widely through the medical field. The remedy for a lack of practitioner knowledge is education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.