ArticleCureus2025
Vaginal Ring Pessary Migration and Embedment With Rectal Prolapse: A Rare Complication of a Forgotten Ring Pessary in an Elderly Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of a vaginal ring pessary is a common nonsurgical option for the management of pelvic organ prolapse. It may sometimes be considered a first-line option for patients who are not suitable surgical candidates. Pessaries generally have a good safety profile, and serious adverse complications are uncommon. However, long-term use without appropriate follow-up may lead to rare and severe complications. We report a case of vaginal ring pessary migration and embedment with rectal prolapse in an 81-year-old woman. She presented to the Emergency Department complaining of a lump in the perineum. She had a background of pelvic organ prolapse, for which a ring pessary was inserted more than 16 years ago. On examination, she was found to have procidentia and a grade 4 rectal prolapse, with a vaginal ring pessary embedded through the low rectum. The pessary was removed under general anesthesia, and no patent rectovaginal fistula was observed. She made an uneventful recovery and was discharged on the third day of admission. This rare complication of a retained vaginal pessary underscores the importance of follow-up and the need for a recall system for patients using vaginal pessaries. It also highlights that patient selection is key when offering vaginal pessary as a treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.