ReviewCureus2025
Socket Shield Technique in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Complications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The socket shield technique (SST) is an innovative approach in implant dentistry designed to preserve the buccal bone plate and soft tissue aesthetics during implant placement. By retaining a portion of the tooth root, the SST aims to reduce alveolar ridge resorption and improve peri-implant tissue stability. This systematic review evaluates the survival outcomes and limitations of the SST through an analysis of longitudinal studies published between January 2019 and December 2024. A comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified 448 articles, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Several key outcomes were assessed, including implant survival rates, Pink Esthetic Scores, marginal bone loss, and complications, such as shield exposure and peri-implantitis. The findings demonstrate that the SST reduces bone resorption and enhances aesthetic outcomes, particularly in the anterior region. However, challenges such as technical sensitivity, shield mobility, and limited long-term data limit its applicability in clinical settings. Additionally, variations in methodology among studies underscore the need for further high-quality research. This review highlights the importance of meticulous surgical execution, patient selection, and standardized protocols to optimize SST outcomes. Future directions should prioritize long-term evaluations, advanced digital workflows, and innovative biomaterials to address current limitations and enhance the clinical utility of the SST in implant dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.