Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600068›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2025

Ten tips on how to deal with calciphylaxis patients.

Api Chewcharat, Sagar U Nigwekar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Api ChewcharatDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1707-9988
Sagar U NigwekarDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calciphylaxis is a devastating disease characterized by painful ischemic necrotic skin lesions, primarily affecting patients with end-stage kidney disease. Its incidence has significantly increased over the past decade. Despite substantial morbidity and mortality, the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis remains poorly understood, and currently there are currently no approved treatments available. Diagnosis largely relies on clinical suspicion; skin biopsy may be useful but is not essential, particularly when biopsy risks outweigh benefits. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach. Current therapeutic strategies include controlling metabolic bone disease, substituting vitamin K antagonists with alternative anticoagulants, discontinuing calcium and vitamin D supplements, optimizing dialysis protocols, and considering sodium thiosulfate. Promising novel therapies are now emerging. These 10 tips aim to help clinicians avoid common pitfalls and deliver optimal care to patients with calciphylaxis.

Indexed as

calciphylaxisdiagnosissodium thiosulfatevitamin Kwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID40600068
PMCPMC12209780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.