ArticlemLife2025
Habitat and lifestyle affect the spatial dynamics of prokaryotic communities along a river-estuary-sea continuum.
Article in mLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial biogeography and its controlling mechanisms are central themes in microbial ecology. However, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of how habitats and lifestyles affect microbial biogeography across complex environmental gradients. In this study, we investigated the planktonic (including free-living [FL] and particle-associated [PA] lifestyles) and benthic prokaryotic communities along a river-estuary-sea continuum of the Changjiang River to explore their distinct spatial dynamics. We observed greater community variability across spatial distances than between habitat and lifestyle types. Spatial variations were evident in FL, PA, and benthic communities, with the highest turnover rates observed in benthic communities, followed by PA, and the lowest turnover rates observed in FL. The replacement effect dominated PA and benthic community variations, whereas the richness effect was more significant in FL communities. Microbial assembly was primarily governed by homogeneous selection and dispersal limitation regardless of habitats/lifestyles, with their ratios decreasing as the spatial distance increased, particularly in the FL fraction. Dispersal limitation had a stronger effect on benthic communities compared to planktonic communities. While heterogeneous selection generally played a minor role, its influence became more pronounced over larger spatial distances and with increasing salinity differences. Finally, we showed that abiotic and biotic factors individually exerted a greater influence on PA communities, whereas their interactions had a stronger effect on FL communities. Our results revealed complex spatial dynamics and assembly mechanisms among microorganisms across different habitats and lifestyles, providing insights into the spatial scaling of community assembly across complex environmental gradients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.