ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Monitoring respiratory function with telemedicine devices in asthmatic children.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Opportunities Offered by Telemedicine in the Care of Patients Affected by Fractures and Critical Issues: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pediatric asthma requires continuous monitoring, traditionally reliant on in-person assessments. Home-based telespirometry offers a promising approach, enabling regular lung function testing, early exacerbation detection, and improved disease management while reducing the burden of in-person visits. However, its effectiveness and accuracy compared to clinical measurements need further evaluation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of home spirometry in children with moderate asthma and to compare home-based lung function measurements with those obtained under clinical supervision. Methods: Eleven children (aged 8-17 years) with moderate asthma were trained to use a handheld spirometer and an associated mobile app. Participants performed home spirometry at least four times per week over a 12-month period, following ERS/ATS standards. Key respiratory parameters, including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV Results: Home spirometry demonstrated a high rate of reliable measurements, with no significant decline in reliability over time. A positive correlation was observed between the number of home spirometry recordings and the reliability of FEV Conclusion: The difference in peak flow indices measured at home and lung function labs in asthmatic children highlights the importance of patient education, and the reliabilities indicate the need for frequent assessments. The strong agreement with clinical measurements supports its potential integration into routine asthma care, enabling more accessible and continuous disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.