ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Association of critical thinking disposition with personality traits and differentiation of self in medical undergraduates, a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical thinking disposition in Chinese students: a meta-analysis of studies published from 2000 to 2025.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Factors Associated with Critical Thinking Disposition in Postgraduate Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critical thinking is one of the seven essential competencies of the Global Minimum Essential Requirements in Medical Education. It is essential to cultivate medical students' critical thinking as it influences their clinical decision-making. The undergraduate years represent a critical period for medical students in terms of personality development and self-differentiation, which are essential foundations for shaping critical thinking. Therefore, this multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationships of critical thinking disposition with personality traits and differentiation of self in medical undergraduates. Methods: A total of 1,338 medical students from three institutions in China were selected for this study using a stratified cluster sampling method. The Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and Differentiation of Self Inventory-Revised (DSI-R) were applied to assess medical students' critical thinking disposition, personality traits and differentiation of self. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to test the relationships of critical thinking disposition with personality traits and differentiation of self. Binary logistic regression model was established for sensitivity analysis. Results: Linear regression analysis showed that psychoticism and neuroticism could negatively influence critical thinking disposition [β, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.363 (-0.411, -0.316); -0.129 (-0.189, -0.070)]. Conversely, extraversion and differentiation of self could positively influence critical thinking disposition [β, 95% CI = 0.145 (0.096, 0.194); 0.279 (0.224, 0.334)]. The results of the binary logistic regression were consistent with those of the linear regression model. Discussion: This study suggested the potential need for tailored critical thinking development strategies for medical students with different personality traits and degrees of differentiation of self.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.