Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Neutrophil and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of clinical characteristics in patients with Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Lulu Yang, Liting Huang, Yingquan Luo, Siying Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lulu YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Liting HuangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yingquan LuoDepartment of General Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Siying RenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Lymphangioleiomyoma (LAM) is a rare multisystemic disease with variable clinical manifestations. This study aim to evaluate the potential of neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting treatment response and prognosis in LAM. Methods: Lymphangioleiomyoma patients hospitalized in the respiratory department from January 2013 to January 2024 were retrospectively collected. Baseline data, routine blood tests, pulmonary function, and lung computed tomography (CT) were recorded, and the NLR was calculated. Patients were divided into pneumothorax and no-pneumothorax groups based on pneumothorax occurrence. Differences between the two groups were compared, and significantly different indicators were further analyzed. Results: A total of 78 patients with LAM were included in the study, 42 of them developed pneumothorax from registration to the end of follow-up, and 36 did not develop pneumothorax. There were differences in neutrophils, eosinophils, and NLR between the two groups ( Conclusion: Lymphangioleiomyoma patients with higher neutrophil and NLR values have worse lung function and may be more susceptible to spontaneous pneumothorax, and sirolimus treatment reduces neutrophil and NLR values in LAM patients with pneumothorax.

Indexed as

Lymphangioleiomyomaneutrophilsneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioprognosisrare diseases

Identifiers

PMID40600043
PMCPMC12209317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.