Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600029›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Lymphadenectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Endometrial Cancer in Intermediate and High-Intermediate Risk Groups: The Ukrainian Experience.

Olha Khoptiana, Valentyn Svintsitskyi, Sergiy Nespryadko, Natalia P Tsip, Teimuraz Gogisvanidze, Mikheil Dzimistarishvili, Dmytro Krasylenko, Mykhailo Serhiiovych Chetverikov, Igor Pavlovych Nigutsa, Dmytro Sumtsov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Olha KhoptianaScientific and Clinical Department of the Female Reproductive System Neoplasms, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-6308
Valentyn SvintsitskyiScientific and Clinical Department of the Female Reproductive System Neoplasms, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-7722-465X
Sergiy NespryadkoScientific and Clinical Department of the Female Reproductive System Neoplasms, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-1559
Natalia P TsipScientific and Clinical Department of the Female Reproductive System Neoplasms, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-7137
Teimuraz GogisvanidzeOncogynecological Department, Kyiv Regional Oncology Center, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0006-1119-608X
Mikheil DzimistarishviliOncogynecological Department, Kyiv Regional Oncology Center, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0000-0991-5782
Dmytro KrasylenkoOncogynecological Department, Kyiv Regional Oncology Center, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0006-9621-6253
Mykhailo Serhiiovych ChetverikovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-9733
Igor Pavlovych NigutsaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0005-8109-0662
Dmytro SumtsovOncogynecological department, Sumy Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Sumy, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-6902
Pavlo DolykOncogynecological department, Medical Center "med-Atlant", Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0008-6681-0061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to lymphadenectomy. Additionally, we evaluated the postoperative complications of the two methods. Patients and Methods: This retrospective multicenter trial included 118 patients with intermediate and high-intermediate Stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer. Patients with non-endometrioid tumors and those with lymphadenopathy detected on computed tomography were excluded. The study group underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. In contrast, the control group underwent systematic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels, the level of the inferior mesenteric artery, or the bifurcation of the iliac vessels. Recurrence-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (95% confidence interval). Results: Patients were recruited from 2017 to March 2024. In the control group, six (5.9%) patients experienced disease recurrence and five (4.2%) died. Overall, two (1.7%) patients from both groups died from causes unrelated to recurrence. Recurrence-free survival did not significantly differ between those who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (96.3%, SE ± 0.036) and those who underwent lymphadenectomy (89.4%, SE ± 0.045) over 3 years from the date of surgery to the time of the first recurrence (p = 0.608). Eighteen postoperative complications were identified: 11 (9.3%) patients experienced complications within 30 days of follow-up, and 7 (5.9%) within 90 days. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy may serve as an alternative to systemic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging without compromising recurrence-free survival.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerlymphadenectomysentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40600029
PMCPMC12209527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.