ReviewDEN open2026
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gastroenterostomy for Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction.
Review in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: Recent Trends and Advances.Cancers · 2026Review
- Etiology, diagnosis, and management of chronic pancreatitis associated primary complications: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent: an animal study comparison of wireless and over-the-wire techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) often results from intrinsic conditions like peptic strictures, caustic-induced stricture, and surgical anastomoses, and extrinsic conditions like pancreatitis, hematoma, and superior mesenteric artery syndrome. While traditional management involved surgery or endoscopic balloon dilation, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). We aimed to summarize the currently available literature on EUS-GE in treating benign GOO. EUS-GE demonstrates high technical success rates, ranging from 95% to 100%, and significant clinical success, typically exceeding 80% in patients with benign GOO. It offers advantages by bypassing the obstruction and potentially providing longer-lasting relief compared to enteral stenting without the morbidity of surgery. Furthermore, it can serve as a bridge to definitive treatment, allowing for nutritional optimization before surgery or resolution of the underlying condition with subsequent stent removal in a notable proportion of patients. Despite the high efficacy, EUS-GE is associated with multiple adverse events like maldeployment, bleeding, and ascites with or without infection. Thus, EUS-GE is a promising and effective minimally invasive modality for managing benign GOO, particularly in patients who fail conventional endoscopic therapies or are poor surgical candidates. However, current evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of many studies, small sample sizes, and the need for longer-term follow-up to assess stent durability and the optimal management of indwelling LAMS. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further define the role of EUS-GE in benign GOO and compare it with other treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.