Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599964›Full record

ArticleFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2025

Advocacy in Psychiatry.

Eric Rafla-Yuan, Mandar Jadhav, Melissa A Peace, Laura Willing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric Rafla-YuanSocial Determinants of Health Network, San Diego, California (Rafla-Yuan); National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, Maryland (Jadhav); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC (Peace, Willing); Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC (Willing).
Mandar JadhavSocial Determinants of Health Network, San Diego, California (Rafla-Yuan); National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, Maryland (Jadhav); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC (Peace, Willing); Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC (Willing).
Melissa A PeaceSocial Determinants of Health Network, San Diego, California (Rafla-Yuan); National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, Maryland (Jadhav); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC (Peace, Willing); Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC (Willing).
Laura WillingSocial Determinants of Health Network, San Diego, California (Rafla-Yuan); National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, Maryland (Jadhav); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC (Peace, Willing); Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC (Willing).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advocacy is a fundamental responsibility of all physicians, and psychiatrists are uniquely positioned as advocates because of their expertise in understanding the intersection between mental health, social determinants, and systemic barriers. Defined as giving voice to advance patient and population health, physician advocacy spans a continuum of activities, including micro-level efforts focused on individual patients, meso-level initiatives targeting organizational and community improvements, and macro-level interventions addressing systemic changes. Advocacy training enhances competence in these domains, but significant gaps persist in advocacy integration into medical education. Although insufficient institutional support, lack of formalized requirements, and limited recognition in academic or career promotion hinder advocacy skill development, professional organizations provide opportunities to develop and refine advocacy competencies, obtain mentorship, and identify avenues for engaging with policy makers. Through advocacy, psychiatrists have made significant contributions at individual, community, and national levels-and continue to be essential in driving systemic change to improve health.

Indexed as

AdvocacyHealth Policy and LegislationMedical EducationSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID40599964
PMCPMC12207497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.