ArticleFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2025
Advocacy in Psychiatry.
Article in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advocacy is a fundamental responsibility of all physicians, and psychiatrists are uniquely positioned as advocates because of their expertise in understanding the intersection between mental health, social determinants, and systemic barriers. Defined as giving voice to advance patient and population health, physician advocacy spans a continuum of activities, including micro-level efforts focused on individual patients, meso-level initiatives targeting organizational and community improvements, and macro-level interventions addressing systemic changes. Advocacy training enhances competence in these domains, but significant gaps persist in advocacy integration into medical education. Although insufficient institutional support, lack of formalized requirements, and limited recognition in academic or career promotion hinder advocacy skill development, professional organizations provide opportunities to develop and refine advocacy competencies, obtain mentorship, and identify avenues for engaging with policy makers. Through advocacy, psychiatrists have made significant contributions at individual, community, and national levels-and continue to be essential in driving systemic change to improve health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.