Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599956›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus levobupivacaine for hemodynamic response towards skull pin insertion.

Aishwarya Srinivasan, Shraddha Naik, Jamale P B

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aishwarya SrinivasanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Shraddha NaikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Jamale P BDepartment of Anesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Karad, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local anesthetics such as levobupivacaine, along with fentanyl and intravenous dexmedetomidine, have shown potential in reducing sympathetic activation and tension. Therefore, it is of interest to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine with levobupivacaine. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 40 each, designated as Group D and Group S, with measures including baseline, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. At baseline, no significant difference in saturation was seen across the Groups (p = 0.10). Likewise, during induction and at subsequent intervals (1 minute before and after skull pin placement, as well as at 3, 5, and 10 minutes thereafter), Spo2 levels were similar across the two groups (all p > 0.05). We concluded that the scalp block using fentanyl-levobupivacaine and intravenous dexmedetomidine has comparable efficacy in diminishing the hemodynamic response associated with the skull pin head.

Indexed as

fentanylHemodynamic responseintravenous dexmedetomidinelevobupivacainelocal anesthesiaskull pin head

Identifiers

PMID40599956
PMCPMC12208229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.