Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599939›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Open surgical management of ureteric strictures: A retrospective study.

Sanjay P Dhangar, Dhaval Rasal, Shashank Patil, Amirtha Balakumar, Swapnil Vaidya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjay P DhangarDepartment of Urology Bharati Hospital & Research Centre, BVU, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dhaval RasalDepartment of Urology Bharati Hospital & Research Centre, BVU, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Shashank PatilDepartment of Urology Bharati Hospital & Research Centre, BVU, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amirtha BalakumarDepartment of General Surgery & Urology, Melmaruvathur Adiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences (MAPIMS), Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Swapnil VaidyaDepartment of Urology, VishwaRaj Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral strictures may arise from long standing nephro/urolithiasis, radiation, use of lasers for treatment of stones, trauma, ischemia, and iatrogenic injury. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the long-term results of ureteral reconstruction using different techniques. Hence, all benign ureteral strictures that more than 2 cm at the level of the pelvi-ureteric junction, upper or mid-ureter, or loss of long length of ureter not suitable for Boar's flap or ureteric reconstruction at a tertiary hospital were included in this study. The mean length of the stricture was 4.5 cms with longest stricture length of 10.4 cms. The success rate of the ureteric reconstruction surgery in our study was 96.7% with recurrence in 3.2% cases after 13 months. Thus, the largest study on open ureteric reconstruction using variety of techniques is reported.

Indexed as

buccal mucosal ureteroplastyileal ureterperitoneal flap reconstructionureteric reconstructionUreteric stricture

Identifiers

PMID40599939
PMCPMC12208239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.