ArticleBioinformation2025
Comparative effect of bupivacaine local anesthesia with ropivacaine present with fentanyl.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of adding dexmedetomidine to fascia iliaca compartment block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing femoral fractures surgery: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local anesthetics for lower limb anesthesia frequently use ropivacaine and bupivacaine due to their unique pharmacological properties. The point of this study was to look at how well efficacy of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl worked in spinal anesthesia and compare and talk about them. Each group evaluated a total of 30 patients using various parameters to assess side effects and complications. We found among patients receiving bupivacaine, 70.0% did not require rescue medication, whereas 30.0% did. In contrast, among patients receiving ropivacaine, 86.7% did not require rescue medication, while 13.3% did. Thus, found non-significant difference. Bupivacaine has a faster onset and longer duration of sensory block and motor block, providing better early pain alleviation than ropivacaine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.