ArticleBioinformation2025
Effect of obturation techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Functional and Bioactive Performance of Premixed Bioceramic Sealers with Warm Obturation: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of endodontic treatment depends on the obturation method that influences the structural strength of treated teeth. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the fracture resistance of 60 single-rooted premolars using Cold Lateral Compaction, Warm Vertical Compaction, or the Single Cone Technique with Bioceramic Sealer, followed by compressive testing after four weeks in artificial saliva. The Single Cone Technique with Bioceramic Sealer showed the highest fracture resistance (600±55 N) followed by Warm Vertical Compaction (520±45 N), while Cold Lateral Compaction had the lowest resistance (450±50 N) (p<0.05). This shows that the Single Cone Technique with Bioceramic Sealer provides superior reinforcement, whereas Cold Lateral Compaction is least effective. Thus, clinicians should consider obturation techniques based on their impact on tooth strength to improve long-term treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.