Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599929›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Spinal anaesthesia to caesarean section: Patient satisfaction.

Tripti Vatsalya, Vikas Kumar Gupta, Rajni Thakur, Sonal Awasya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tripti VatsalyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.
Vikas Kumar GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.
Rajni ThakurDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.
Sonal AwasyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient satisfaction on spinal anaesthesia to caesarean section is of interest. Hence, data from 60 female doctors of various disciplines working in Bhopal city who underwent caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia during the last 5 years were included in this study. Factors associated with dissatisfaction were lack of communication and explanations for anaesthesia. Level of satisfaction with pain control was (86.6%). Pre-operative complications which scored highest are intraoperative shivering (10%), post-operative pain (20%) and backache (18.3%). Thus, the overall satisfaction among doctors receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section was significantly high and major contributing factors for dissatisfaction need to be addressed.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionmaternal satisfactionSpinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40599929
PMCPMC12208259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.