ArticleBioinformation2025
Pain relief for femur fractures using Fascia Iliaca Block and IV fentanyl.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximal femur fractures cause severe pain making spinal anesthesia positioning difficult. Therefore, it is of interest to compare ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (F.I.C.B) with IV fentanyl for pain relief. 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients were randomly divided into two groups, receiving either Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine) or IV fentanyl (1 mcg/kg). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were similar at baseline but significantly lower in Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block group during positioning (2.38 ± 0.49 vs 4.34 ± 0.72, p < 0.0001). Further, Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block also led to faster spinal anesthesia (6.21 ± 0.86 vs 6.96 ± 0.2 min, p < 0.0001) and longer pain relief (4.72 ± 0.78 vs 2.7 ± 0.76 hrs, p < 0.0001) with stable vitals and no significant difference in side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.