Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599862›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Update in the clinical utilization of chemoprevention for breast cancer: a narrative review.

Razan Mansour, Mahmoud Abunasser, Baha' Sharaf, Hikmat Abdel-Razeq

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Razan MansourDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Mahmoud AbunasserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Baha' SharafDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Hikmat Abdel-RazeqDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, prompts research into chemoprevention strategies. This narrative review explores risk factors, assessment tools, and summarizes the effectiveness and side effects of chemopreventive agents used for breast cancer risk reduction. Methods: Published data from major clinical trials, meta-analyses, and data presented at major international conferences that addressed the utilization of tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibitors (AI) and other potential drugs are reviewed. Risk assessments models utilized to assess women's risk of getting breast cancer are discussed, too. Results: Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), demonstrated efficacy in reducing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal and premenopausal women. However, it poses several worrisome adverse events. Raloxifene, another SERM, has risk-reducing benefits with a better safety profile compared to tamoxifen. AI, like anastrozole and exemestane, reduced invasive breast cancer with better side effect profile. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that tackles receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK-RANKL), is promising in preventing breast cancer in healthy carriers of pathogenic Conclusion: Chemopreventive agents present opportunities for reducing breast cancer risk. However, careful consideration of side effects and individual risk factors are crucial to enhance uptake rate. Further research is needed to compare the effectiveness of SERMs and AI in preventing breast cancer, especially in high-risk populations with pathogenic germline mutations.

Indexed as

AIanastrozolearomatase inhibitorsbreast cancerchemopreventionexemestanetamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID40599862
PMCPMC12209358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.