ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Update in the clinical utilization of chemoprevention for breast cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacotherapeutic considerations of selective estrogen receptor modulators for vascular protection.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- National and Subnational Burden of Female Breast Cancer in Iran from 2010 to 2021.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Marine-Derived Steroids for Cancer Treatment: Search for Potential Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Agonists/Modulators (SEGRAMs).Marine drugs · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, prompts research into chemoprevention strategies. This narrative review explores risk factors, assessment tools, and summarizes the effectiveness and side effects of chemopreventive agents used for breast cancer risk reduction. Methods: Published data from major clinical trials, meta-analyses, and data presented at major international conferences that addressed the utilization of tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibitors (AI) and other potential drugs are reviewed. Risk assessments models utilized to assess women's risk of getting breast cancer are discussed, too. Results: Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), demonstrated efficacy in reducing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal and premenopausal women. However, it poses several worrisome adverse events. Raloxifene, another SERM, has risk-reducing benefits with a better safety profile compared to tamoxifen. AI, like anastrozole and exemestane, reduced invasive breast cancer with better side effect profile. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that tackles receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK-RANKL), is promising in preventing breast cancer in healthy carriers of pathogenic Conclusion: Chemopreventive agents present opportunities for reducing breast cancer risk. However, careful consideration of side effects and individual risk factors are crucial to enhance uptake rate. Further research is needed to compare the effectiveness of SERMs and AI in preventing breast cancer, especially in high-risk populations with pathogenic germline mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.