ReviewPleura and peritoneum2025
The microbiome of pseudomyxoma peritonei: a scoping review.
Review in Pleura and peritoneum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposed strategy after complete LAMN (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm) resection by different RENAPE units: need for a new consensus?Pleura and peritoneum · 2026Article
- Research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing interest in the role of the microbiome in carcinogenesis, but few studies examine the microbiome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). This scoping review summarises the microorganisms identified in PMP samples and examines the evidence of their role in disease outcomes. The methodology was developed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR framework and checklist. Nine relevant studies were included. Microbiological testing was performed on PMP samples from 85 patients. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria was detected in greatest relative abundance in tumour tissue, cellular and acellular mucin. The relative proportion of different phyla more closely resembled the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease than in a healthy gut. High-grade specimens showed significantly higher bacterial density than low-grade specimens and non-neoplastic non-perforated appendix specimens. Survival data of 58 patients were published, correlating outcomes to pre-operative antibiotic administration. Observed differences were not statistically significant. There is evidence of an altered bacterial profile in PMP samples compared to a healthy gut microbiome, the significance of which is unclear. Significant methodological challenges remain in this field of study. This scoping review supports the need for further analysis of the PMP bacterial profile, using methodologies that incorporate controls and deliver taxonomic resolution at species level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.