Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599845›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2025

The impact of surgical staging in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS-HIPEC.

Lana Ghanipour, Johan Wallin, Peter Cashin, Wilhelm Graf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lana GhanipourDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-8228
Johan WallinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter CashinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Wilhelm GrafDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical staging procedures are used to select patients with peritoneal metastases for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical staging procedures and the risk of abdominal wall recurrences in patients with peritoneal metastases scheduled for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Methods: Data were collected from a prospective maintained HIPEC register January 2012-December 2019. Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases were included. Information about surgical staging procedures was registered. Results were then compared with those registered at definite CRS-HIPEC surgery and survival was analysed in relation to surgical staging procedures. Results: In total, 138 patients were included, of whom 32 had undergone a surgical staging procedure before CRS-HIPEC. Median overall survival in the surgical staging group was 1.89 years and in the non-staging group 3.07 years (p=0.060). In the surgical staging group, eight patients developed abdominal wall recurrences (25 %) compared with three (3 %) in the non-staged group. Eight staged patients (25 %) were considered inoperable at definite surgery (open-close). PCI score (p<0.001) was higher at definite surgery in patients who had undergone a staging laparoscopy. Factors associated with shorter overall survival in multivariate analysis were: open and close, PCI ≥21 and presence of signet ring cells. However, a staging procedure was not associated with a shorter overall survival. Conclusions: Surgical staging procedures is a valuable assessment of inoperability, though at the expense of more frequent abdominal wall recurrences. Imaging-based strategies may provide useful insights into whether surgical staging is the most effective approach for patient selection.

Indexed as

colorectal peritoneal metastasesCRS-HIPECstaging laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40599845
PMCPMC12207389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.